2008.11.06 if i don't win, i'm-a gonna break even:
I probably should have been like everyone else and posted my big political post yesterday, but I just had to take a day off and reflect. That and I'm intensely lazy.
Yeah. So. Wow. How about that? The American people stepped up, said they had had enough of this Bush/NeoCon bullshit, and elected a man who has spent the past two years inspiring voters from all walks of life, all across this country. I'll be honest…I didn't always have faith that it was going to turn out this way. More often than I would care to admit, I lay awake in the dark, thinking about stolent elections, extended wars, and complete economic collapse. I actually (in my head) started preparing for a possible Mad Max style future where I was going to have to convert a motocross bike to run on vegetable oil and live out in the woods, eating squirrel.
So, obviously, I was pretty overjoyed, tuesday night. True, the good people of the great Commonwealth of Kentucky did not oust Mitch McConnell, but I figure it's still a win.
I still don't have much to say about it. I'm probably still in shock. I've come to accept that it happened. That it's reality. I just can't quite put all of my thoughts in order to say much more about it.
Popularity: unranked [?]






brian. said:
mine.
Javan said:
mine
m@ said:
i love the fact that you tested as a liberal. economic liberal, social centrist, perhaps, but still more liberal than conservative. brings a smile to my face and warmth to my heart.
brian. said:
there's hope yet…
the puffin said:
the boy is leaning more towards the stalin left than the ghandi left, if the graph holds true.
m@ said:
that may be a bit of an extreme interpretation, if technically correct. he does lean ever so slightly more towards social authoritarianism than libertarianism, but only ever so slightly. i don't think we have to worry about him becoming a fascist any time soon.
Javan said:
fas?cism
n.
1. often Fascism
1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Interesting turnout of MY political quiz, no? The Libertarian party quiz made made a centrist, also. I find it somewhat creepy I have been compared to Hitler. Oh well.
m@ said:
well, as i said, that's really a bit of an extreme interpretation, i'd say. you're closer to ghandhi than you are to hitler.
m@ said:
oh, and nobody compared you to hitler anyway, so… QUITYERBITCHIN!
hehe.
i also just realized that when paul mentioned "Stalin" i was *thinking* "Mussolini", so my inference that paul was comparing you to a *fascist* dictator was wrong anyway… he was actually comparing you to a communist one.
damn these labels. communism is a econo-political philosophy, where fascism (by its very definition, thanks Javan) is a socio-political one. so, we're still mixing our apple basket with our orange basket.
brian. said:
and remember…Stalin wasn't a communist…he was a Stalinist. Marx's way of government will never be had on this earth.
can't say whether that's good or bad. The Communist Manifesto is riddled by good ideas…and some really bad ones.
m@ said:
true. true.
the existing "communist" governments are communist in name only, and have only a passing resemblance to Marx's ideals.
brian. said:
marx: a man before his time.
yet, the Communist Manifesto will forever be lumped in with Mein Kampf as far as political treatise go.