Comments on: validate me: http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/ twice your daddy's blog! Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:11:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1692 brian. Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:06:36 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1692 COnsider it voted on. COnsider it voted on.

]]> By: m@ http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1691 m@ Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:08:30 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1691 yeah, that's one of the reasons i wanted to stay away from the full-page scroll, 'cause even though you post more frequently, i post more voluminously. yeah, i like the fix to 2.0, it's nothing huge, but i think it brings it together a bit. as for why i've got to keep changing things, you should keep in mind that it's always a struggle to *improve* things, not simply to change them for changes sake. seth says the new pages actually display pretty well in the text-based browsers now, so that's a bonus. it just means the pages should degrade fairly well. as for the scrolly thing, we've gotta get the firefox devs to fix the boog. vote for this bug <a href="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241418" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241418</a> (it was the most appropriate one i could find) yeah, that's one of the reasons i wanted to stay away from the full-page scroll, 'cause even though you post more frequently, i post more voluminously.

yeah, i like the fix to 2.0, it's nothing huge, but i think it brings it together a bit.

as for why i've got to keep changing things, you should keep in mind that it's always a struggle to *improve* things, not simply to change them for changes sake.

seth says the new pages actually display pretty well in the text-based browsers now, so that's a bonus. it just means the pages should degrade fairly well.

as for the scrolly thing, we've gotta get the firefox devs to fix the boog. vote for this bug http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241418
(it was the most appropriate one i could find)

]]> By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1690 brian. Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:07:44 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1690 By the way: I like how the Bipolar 2.0 theme looks in your new version. Fix that scrolly thing and you're gold! By the way: I like how the Bipolar 2.0 theme looks in your new version. Fix that scrolly thing and you're gold!

]]> By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1689 brian. Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:26:23 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1689 Also: Why the fuck won't Seth return my calls or emails? Also: Why the fuck won't Seth return my calls or emails?

]]> By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1688 brian. Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:25:47 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1688 Why you always gotta change shit, bitch? What the fuck is up with you? Point: Look at the difference in length of our sides in the low-tech version. That should be your answer, right there. Why you always gotta change shit, bitch? What the fuck is up with you?

Point: Look at the difference in length of our sides in the low-tech version. That should be your answer, right there.

]]> By: m@ http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1687 m@ Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:34:56 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1687 MC Seth-yo did me a huge favor and tested all the new versions in different browsers. i've still got some work to do to make them "truly universal" but what we've got is a good start. a guess a good question to ask would be... how important is it to maintain the "fits in the window" look, versus a big long-ass scrolly page look (like the lowtech theme)? MC Seth-yo did me a huge favor and tested all the new versions in different browsers. i've still got some work to do to make them "truly universal" but what we've got is a good start.

a guess a good question to ask would be… how important is it to maintain the "fits in the window" look, versus a big long-ass scrolly page look (like the lowtech theme)?

]]> By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1686 brian. Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:03:23 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1686 Then I'm betting your whole idea is STUPID! The regular version, by the by, works perfectly in Firefox. *stomps off angrily* Then I'm betting your whole idea is STUPID!

The regular version, by the by, works perfectly in Firefox.

*stomps off angrily*

]]> By: m@ http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1685 m@ Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:05:14 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1685 yeah. i've noticed that one too... it works in IE, but not in Moz/FireFox... i'm going to try to find out if there's a way to fix that, but i'm betting there's not much i can do. yeah. i've noticed that one too… it works in IE, but not in Moz/FireFox…

i'm going to try to find out if there's a way to fix that, but i'm betting there's not much i can do.

]]> By: brian. http://www.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1684 brian. Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:21:33 +0000 http://dev.x13design.com/bipolar/2004/09/14/validate-me/#comment-1684 The "frames" don't scroll on mouse over focus (with a scroll wheel mouse). The "frames" don't scroll on mouse over focus (with a scroll wheel mouse).

]]>